Niedawno miała miejsce premiera nowej serii porcesorów intel Core - to już 10. generacja, ale wciąż w procesie 14nm (choć znów nieznacznie ulepszonym). Tuaj przedstawiam analizę wyników dla nowego Core i9 tylko i wyłącznie w grach.
Jaką na prawdę wydajność ma dziesięciordzeniowy Core i9 10900K w grach? Zapraszam do zapoznania się z rezultatami z aż 35 gier.
Nie będę wdawał się w szczegóły konstrukcyjne nowego procesora, ani w to co nowego zostało w nim zastosowane. Skupię się wyłącznie na wynikach, które interesują graczy.
Zebrane wyniki ułożyłem wg danego serwisu i gry. Dla każdego wyniku z gry podaję średnią liczbę klatek na sekundę (FPS) oraz średni wzrost (lub spadek) procentowy względem wybranych procesorów:
10900K vs 3900X - porównanie
Core i9 10900K vs
Ryzen 9 3900X (czyli do zbliżonego modelu AMD pod względem wydajności i ceny, choć Ryzen jest sporo tańszy),
10900K vs 3700X - porównanie
Core i9 10900K vs
Ryzen 9 3700X (porównanie do jeszcze tańszego modelu AMD).
10900K vs 9700K - porównanie Core i9 10900K vs Core i7 9700K (wydajnego modelu poprzedniej generacji),
10900K vs 9900K - porównanie Core i9 10600K vs Core i7 9900K (bezpośredniego konkurenta z poprzedniej generacji),
Nazwy procesorów zostały skrócone (usunąłem przedrostki Ryzen 9, Ryzen 7, Core i9, Core i7, itd.).
Rezultaty z różnych serwisów mogą się różnić mniej lub bardziej - zależy to od dobranego miejsca testowego, poziomu detali, rozdzielczości, trybu AA, a także użytej karty graficznej, pamięci RAM, czy płyty głównej. Poniżej zebrałem podstawowe informacje jak testowały dane redakcje:
serwis | skrót | konfiguracja |
pclab | PCL | Intel 1200:2933 MHz 16-16-16-36, Intel 1151:2666 MHz 16-16-16-36, AMD:3200 MHz 16-16-16-36, 1920x1080, RTX 2080 |
purepc | PPC | Intel i AMD: 3200 MHz 16-18-18-36, 1920x1080, RTX 2080Ti |
anandtech | AND | Intel 1200: 2933 MHz, Intel 1151: 2666 MHz, AMD: ?, 1920x1080 GTX1080 8 GB |
techpowerup | TPU | Intel i AMD: DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34, 1920x1080, RTX 2080Ti |
Guru 3D | G3D | Intel i AMD: 3600 MHz CL16, 1920x1080, RTX 2080Ti |
benchmark | BMK | Intel 1200: 2933 MHz CL16, Intel 1151: 2666 MHz, AMD: 2666 MHz CL16, 1920x1080, GTX 1080Ti |
techspot | TSP | Intel i AMD: DDR4-3200 CL14, 1920x1080, RTX2080 Ti |
eurogamer | EUG | Intel i AMD: 3600MHz CL16, 1920x1080, RTX 2080 Ti |
gamersnexus | GNX | Intel i AMD: 3200MHz CL16, 1920x1080, RTX 2080 Ti |
tom's hardware | THD | Intel 1200: 2933 MHz, Intel 1151: 2666 MHz, AMD: 3200 MHz, 1920x1080, RTX 2080 Ti |
W przypadku, gdy dla jednej gry było więcej wyników niż tylko z jednego z serwisów brałem pod uwagę średnią wyników z każdego serwisu.
Źródła danych:
Wyniki
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 137 | 141,4 | 152,5 | 157,9 | 165 | 20,44% | 16,69% | 8,20% | 4,50% |
PPC | 125 | 130,5 | 142,3 | 148,4 | 151,9 | 21,52% | 16,40% | 6,75% | 2,36% |
TPU | 178,3 | 180,2 | 182 | 183 | 183,6 | 2,97% | 1,89% | 0,88% | 0,33% |
EUG | 141,4 | 153,9 | 182,3 | 184,7 | 185,6 | 31,26% | 20,60% | 1,81% | 0,49% |
BMK | 136 | 139 | 136 | 144 | 162 | 19,12% | 16,55% | 19,12% | 12,50% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 19,06% | 14,42% | 7,35% | 4,03% |
GTA V | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 82,8 | 84,4 | 86,7 | 89,6 | 99,1 | 19,69% | 17,42% | 14,30% | 10,60% |
THD | 163,6 | 165,9 | 167,9 | 168,9 | 178,3 | 8,99% | 7,47% | 6,19% | 5,57% |
AND | 154,6 | 153,9 | 160,3 | 160,8 | 166,3 | 7,57% | 8,06% | 3,74% | 3,42% |
GNX | 108,8 | 112,2 | 122,1 | 122,6 | 127,8 | 17,46% | 13,90% | 4,67% | 4,24% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 13,43% | 11,71% | 7,23% | 5,96% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 81,4 | 82,4 | 87,9 | 86,6 | 89,4 | 9,83% | 8,50% | 1,71% | 3,23% |
PPC | 68,2 | 69,5 | 72,8 | 74,5 | 77,2 | 13,20% | 11,08% | 6,04% | 3,62% |
EUG | 76,9 | 78,2 | 89,4 | 88,8 | 88,2 | 14,69% | 12,79% | -1,34% | -0,68% |
TPU | 92 | 94,9 | 100,4 | 104,5 | 98,3 | 6,85% | 3,58% | -2,09% | -5,93% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 11,14% | 8,99% | 1,08% | 0,06% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 93,6 | 94 | 94,7 | 97,4 | 97,2 | 3,85% | 3,40% | 2,64% | -0,21% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 3,85% | 3,40% | 2,64% | -0,21% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 114,1 | 114,6 | 117,3 | 120,1 | 123,9 | 8,59% | 8,12% | 5,63% | 3,16% |
THD | 101 | 101,9 | 107,2 | 101,2 | 111,3 | 10,20% | 9,22% | 3,82% | 9,98% |
GNX | 117,6 | 123,9 | | 135,4 | 140,6 | 19,56% | 13,48% | | 3,84% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 12,78% | 10,27% | 4,73% | 5,66% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
BMK | 118 | 119 | 126 | 130 | 132 | 11,86% | 10,92% | 4,76% | 1,54% |
TPU | 115 | 116 | 133,7 | 138,7 | 153,5 | 33,48% | 32,33% | 14,81% | 10,67% |
AND | | 124 | 133 | 136 | 139 | | 12,10% | 4,51% | 2,21% |
THD | 118,1 | 116,7 | 131,2 | 134,5 | 144,8 | 22,61% | 24,08% | 10,37% | 7,66% |
EUG | 120,9 | 125 | 148,6 | 161 | 170,3 | 40,86% | 36,24% | 14,60% | 5,78% |
G3D | 122 | 127 | 147 | 152 | 160 | 31,15% | 25,98% | 8,84% | 5,26% |
PCL | 110,1 | 107,2 | 120,3 | 128,5 | 136,9 | 24,34% | 27,71% | 13,80% | 6,54% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 27,38% | 24,19% | 10,24% | 5,66% |
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 160,4 | 160,6 | 162,3 | 161,7 | 162,9 | 1,56% | 1,43% | 0,37% | 0,74% |
TPU | 313,2 | 314,1 | 316,6 | 315,8 | 322,7 | 3,03% | 2,74% | 1,93% | 2,18% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 2,30% | 2,09% | 1,15% | 1,46% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 132,4 | 132,6 | 144,8 | 142,5 | 143,6 | 8,46% | 8,30% | -0,83% | 0,77% |
TPU | 169,3 | 171 | 174,3 | 177 | 182,2 | 7,62% | 6,55% | 4,53% | 2,94% |
EUG | 156 | 155 | 171,1 | 166,4 | 169,6 | 8,72% | 9,42% | -0,88% | 1,92% |
TSP | 156 | 156 | 170 | 167 | 168 | 7,69% | 7,69% | -1,18% | 0,60% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 8,12% | 7,99% | 0,41% | 1,56% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 113,8 | 111,5 | 121,2 | 121,4 | 122 | 7,21% | 9,42% | 0,66% | 0,49% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 7,21% | 9,42% | 0,66% | 0,49% |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 208,4 | 210,2 | 206,7 | 216,1 | 247,1 | 18,57% | 17,55% | 19,55% | 14,35% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 18,57% | 17,55% | 19,55% | 14,35% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PCL | 101,8 | 100 | 100,2 | 105,2 | 108,5 | 6,58% | 8,50% | 8,28% | 3,14% |
G3D | 131 | 136 | 145 | 147 | 155 | 18,32% | 13,97% | 6,90% | 5,44% |
TPU | 188,2 | 189 | 179,6 | 182,6 | 191,9 | 1,97% | 1,53% | 6,85% | 5,09% |
GNX | 148,8 | 147,2 | 172,1 | 167,1 | 178,1 | 19,69% | 20,99% | 3,49% | 6,58% |
TSP | 124 | 125 | 128 | 128 | 132 | 6,45% | 5,60% | 3,13% | 3,13% |
PPC | 107 | 109,3 | 107,4 | 120 | 126,2 | 17,94% | 15,46% | 17,50% | 5,17% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 11,83% | 11,01% | 7,69% | 4,76% |
Assetto Corsa Competizione
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PPC | 62,6 | 65,2 | 69,6 | 70,3 | 76,9 | 22,84% | 17,94% | 10,49% | 9,39% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 22,84% | 17,94% | 10,49% | 9,39% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TSP | 114 | 114 | 133 | 129 | 134 | 17,54% | 17,54% | 0,75% | 3,88% |
PPC | 87,8 | 89 | 103,6 | 105,2 | 108,9 | 24,03% | 22,36% | 5,12% | 3,52% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 20,79% | 19,95% | 2,93% | 3,70% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PPC | 85,8 | 86,7 | 95,2 | 97,5 | 102,6 | 19,58% | 18,34% | 7,77% | 5,23% |
THD | 164,7 | 168,2 | 168,7 | 167,2 | 168,1 | 2,06% | -0,06% | -0,36% | 0,54% |
AND | | 114,9 | 116 | 116,6 | 115,1 | | 0,17% | -0,78% | -1,29% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 10,82% | 6,15% | 2,21% | 1,49% |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
EUG | 78,1 | 79,1 | 82,4 | 93,6 | 93,9 | 20,23% | 18,71% | 13,96% | 0,32% |
PPC | 47,5 | 49,6 | 50,5 | 55,2 | 58,8 | 23,79% | 18,55% | 16,44% | 6,52% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 22,01% | 18,63% | 15,20% | 3,42% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TPU | 180,1 | 189,1 | 184,1 | 188,1 | 193 | 7,16% | 2,06% | 4,83% | 2,60% |
THD | 143,3 | 149,9 | 142,4 | 142,4 | 157,4 | 9,84% | 5,00% | 10,53% | 10,53% |
PPC | 112,6 | 122,8 | 112,2 | 113,3 | 132,7 | 17,85% | 8,06% | 18,27% | 17,12% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 11,62% | 5,04% | 11,21% | 10,09% |
Total War: Three Kingdoms
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
GNX | 125,2 | 121,2 | 144,5 | 142,2 | 147 | 17,41% | 21,29% | 1,73% | 3,38% |
PPC | 40,8 | 42,2 | 42,6 | 49,4 | 50,2 | 23,04% | 18,96% | 17,84% | 1,62% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 20,23% | 20,12% | 9,79% | 2,50% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
PPC | 76,7 | 81,5 | 80,8 | 85,1 | 92,4 | 20,47% | 13,37% | 14,36% | 8,58% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 20,47% | 13,37% | 14,36% | 8,58% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
THD | 247,1 | 246,7 | 253,3 | 259,1 | 263,1 | 6,48% | 6,65% | 3,87% | 1,54% |
AND | 179,5 | 180,8 | 186,3 | 187,4 | 187,1 | 4,23% | 3,48% | 0,43% | -0,16% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 5,35% | 5,07% | 2,15% | 0,69% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
AND | 99,5 | 96,5 | 102,3 | 103 | 101,1 | 1,61% | 4,77% | -1,17% | -1,84% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 1,61% | 4,77% | -1,17% | -1,84% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
G3D | 217 | 218 | | 227 | 221 | 1,84% | 1,38% | | -2,64% |
AND | 199,6 | 203 | 198,1 | 198,7 | 206,1 | 3,26% | 1,53% | 4,04% | 3,72% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 2,55% | 1,45% | 4,04% | 0,54% |
F1 2018 | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
AND | 205,7 | 208,3 | 207,3 | 206,8 | 211,4 | 2,77% | 1,49% | 1,98% | 2,22% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 2,77% | 1,49% | 1,98% | 2,22% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TSP | 125 | 128 | 133 | 138 | 139 | 11,20% | 8,59% | 4,51% | 0,72% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 11,20% | 8,59% | 4,51% | 0,72% |
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TSP | 266 | 267 | 273 | 277 | 285 | 7,14% | 6,74% | 4,40% | 2,89% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 7,14% | 6,74% | 4,40% | 2,89% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TSP | 131 | 131 | 137 | 137 | 138 | 5,34% | 5,34% | 0,73% | 0,73% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 5,34% | 5,34% | 0,73% | 0,73% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TSP | 101 | 101 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 1,98% | 1,98% | 0,00% | 0,00% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 1,98% | 1,98% | 0,00% | 0,00% |
Crysis 3 | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
EUG | 173,2 | 177,9 | 184,6 | 195,7 | 207,3 | 19,69% | 16,53% | 12,30% | 5,93% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 19,69% | 16,53% | 12,30% | 5,93% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TPU | 145,7 | 142,6 | 153,7 | 150,2 | 157,6 | 8,17% | 10,52% | 2,54% | 4,93% |
EUG | 169,5 | 156,5 | 193,9 | 191,5 | 191,1 | 12,74% | 22,11% | -1,44% | -0,21% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 10,46% | 16,31% | 0,55% | 2,36% |
F1 2019 | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
GNX | 238,7 | 241,1 | 269,1 | 267,7 | 275,7 | 15,50% | 14,35% | 2,45% | 2,99% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 15,50% | 14,35% | 2,45% | 2,99% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
GNX | | | | 204,5 | 202,3 | | | | -1,08% |
| | | | | Średnio: | | | | -1,08% |
Rage 2 | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TPU | 151,9 | 154,7 | 155,1 | 153,3 | 157,8 | 3,88% | 2,00% | 1,74% | 2,94% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 3,88% | 2,00% | 1,74% | 2,94% |
Sekiro | | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
TPU | 156,3 | 160,3 | 178,9 | 183,9 | 194,1 | 24,18% | 21,09% | 8,50% | 5,55% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 24,18% | 21,09% | 8,50% | 5,55% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
THD | 48,6 | 48,4 | 41,1 | 46,5 | 56,4 | 16,05% | 16,53% | 37,23% | 21,29% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 16,05% | 16,53% | 37,23% | 21,29% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
THD | 111,9 | 108,7 | 112,2 | 111,8 | 123,3 | 10,19% | 13,43% | 9,89% | 10,29% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 10,19% | 13,43% | 9,89% | 10,29% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 3700X | 3900X | 9700K | 9900K | 10900K | 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
THD | 123,7 | 120,7 | 128,2 | 142,1 | 149,9 | 21,18% | 24,19% | 16,93% | 5,49% |
| | | | | Średnio: | 21,18% | 24,19% | 16,93% | 5,49% |
Podsumowanie
Biorąc pod uwagę uzyskane wyniki
średnie relacje wydajności w grach wyglądają następująco
:
| 10900K vs 3700X | 10900K vs 3900X | 10900K vs 9700K | 10900K vs 9900K |
Średnio: | 12,46% | 11,24% | 6,92% | 4,13% |
od: | 1,61% | 1,45% | -1,17% | -1,84% |
do: | 27,38% | 24,19% | 37,23% | 21,29% |
mediana: | 11,41% | 10,64% | 4,45% | 2,94% |
Relacje wydajności procesorów
w odniesieniu do Core i9 10900K

Core i9 10900K to nowy król wydajności w grach. Generalnie do najlepszych procesorów Intela poprzedniej generacji zyskuje 5-10%, ale czasami różnice są na prawdę duże. Niestety zestaw procesora i płyty głównej to bardzo duży wydatek, który trudno uzasadnić, nawet gdy weźmiemy pod uwagę rewelacyjną wydajność w grach.
Konkurencja ze strony AMD jest ok. 10% mniej wydajna, ale i sporo tańsza. Decyzja, który procesor warto kupić należy do Was.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz